<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s initiatives in Artificial Intelligence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paperoftheweek.com/2007/06/17/googles-initiatives-in-artificial-intelligence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paperoftheweek.com/2007/06/17/googles-initiatives-in-artificial-intelligence/</link>
	<description>Read. Learn. Discuss.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:05:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.paperoftheweek.com/2007/06/17/googles-initiatives-in-artificial-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-2378</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paperoftheweek.com/2007/06/17/googles-initiatives-in-artificial-intelligence/#comment-2378</guid>
		<description>If you do a search on N engines, you need a criterion to decide which set of results are the best. I am prepared to admit that other search engines are better in specialist spheres. This being so you could, I suppose, decide in what area you wanted to search and provide the appropriate engine four you.

In fact Google already does have specialist areas. The selection of a specialist area should really be transparent to the user.

As I said Google, unlike Windows is not bungled. The fact that Google is constantlt increasing its share seems to point to the fact that it is perceived to be the best for the general search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you do a search on N engines, you need a criterion to decide which set of results are the best. I am prepared to admit that other search engines are better in specialist spheres. This being so you could, I suppose, decide in what area you wanted to search and provide the appropriate engine four you.</p>
<p>In fact Google already does have specialist areas. The selection of a specialist area should really be transparent to the user.</p>
<p>As I said Google, unlike Windows is not bungled. The fact that Google is constantlt increasing its share seems to point to the fact that it is perceived to be the best for the general search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.paperoftheweek.com/2007/06/17/googles-initiatives-in-artificial-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paperoftheweek.com/2007/06/17/googles-initiatives-in-artificial-intelligence/#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>Sorry!  Please make that www.altsearchengines.com  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry!  Please make that <a href="http://www.altsearchengines.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.altsearchengines.com</a>  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.paperoftheweek.com/2007/06/17/googles-initiatives-in-artificial-intelligence/comment-page-1/#comment-2357</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paperoftheweek.com/2007/06/17/googles-initiatives-in-artificial-intelligence/#comment-2357</guid>
		<description>Hi - My name is Charles Knight, the author of the Top 100 Alternative Search Engines list. Just a note that your link is to the oldest list (January)  www.ReadWriteWeb.com has the more recent months and commentary, and the popularity has been such that now there is a new R/WW blog &quot;AltSearchEngines&quot; ww.altsearchengines.com.

There may not be any one (1) alt search engine (ASE) that can challenge Google, but what about our Top Ten (10), what about the Top one hundred (100) list?; what about the Master list we maintain of the Top one thousand (1,000) - could 1,000 ASE muster the creativity and resources necessary to draw some interest away from the major search engines?

Charles Knight, Editor
Charles@ReadWriteWeb
ww.AltSearchEngines.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; My name is Charles Knight, the author of the Top 100 Alternative Search Engines list. Just a note that your link is to the oldest list (January)  <a href="http://www.ReadWriteWeb.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ReadWriteWeb.com</a> has the more recent months and commentary, and the popularity has been such that now there is a new R/WW blog &#8220;AltSearchEngines&#8221; ww.altsearchengines.com.</p>
<p>There may not be any one (1) alt search engine (ASE) that can challenge Google, but what about our Top Ten (10), what about the Top one hundred (100) list?; what about the Master list we maintain of the Top one thousand (1,000) &#8211; could 1,000 ASE muster the creativity and resources necessary to draw some interest away from the major search engines?</p>
<p>Charles Knight, Editor<br />
Charles@ReadWriteWeb<br />
ww.AltSearchEngines.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
